Re: [RFC] PCI bridge driver rewrite

From: Adam Belay
Date: Mon Feb 28 2005 - 18:30:29 EST


On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:02 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:03 pm, Adam Belay wrote:
>
> > > Jesse can comment on the specific support needed for multiple legacy IO
> > > spaces.
> >
> > That would be great. Most of my experience has been with only a couple
> > legacy IO port ranges passing through the bridge.
>
> Well, I'll give you one, somewhat perverse, example. On SGI sn2 machines,
> each host<->pci bridge (either xio<->pci or numalink<->pci) has two pci
> busses and some additional host bus ports. The bridges are capable of
> generating low address bus cycles on both busses simultaneously, so we can do
> ISA memory access and legacy port I/O on every bus in the system at the same
> time.
>
> The main host chipset has no notion of VGA or legacy routing though, so doing
> a port access to say 0x3c8 is ambiguous--we need a bus to target (though the
> platform code could provide a 'default' bus for such accesses to go to, this
> may be what VGA or legacy routing means for us under your scheme). Likewise,
> accessing ISA memory space like 0xa0000 needs a bus to target.
>
> It would be nice if this sort of thing was taken into account in your new
> model, so that for example we could have the vgacon driver talking to
> multiple different VGA cards at the same time.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesse

How can we specify which bus to target? Also is the legacy IO space
mapped to IO Memory on the other side of the bridge?

Thanks,
Adam


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/