Re: [PATCH] raw1394 missing failure handling

[Panagiotis Issaris]

Hi,

Jody McIntyre wrote:

> I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and send it to Linus after testing if
> you add a Signed-off-by: line per Documentation/SubmittingPatches .
> Also, please cc linux1394-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with ieee1394
> changes.
Sure! Thanks!


Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.


Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris <takis@xxxxxxx>

diff -pruN linux-2.6.11/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c linux-2.6.11-pi/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c
--- linux-2.6.11/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c	2005-03-02 11:44:26.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-pi/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c	2005-03-02 15:27:15.000000000 +0100
@@ -443,7 +443,10 @@ static ssize_t raw1394_read(struct file 
                        req->req.error = RAW1394_ERROR_MEMFAULT;
                }
        }
-        __copy_to_user(buffer, &req->req, sizeof(req->req));
+        if (__copy_to_user(buffer, &req->req, sizeof(req->req))) {
+                free_pending_request(req);
+                return -EFAULT;
+        }

        free_pending_request(req);
        return sizeof(struct raw1394_request);



--
 K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Eng.,  Mechatronics & Robotics Research Group
 http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~pissaris/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/