Re: [PATCH][3/3] swsusp: use non-contiguous memory

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Tue Mar 08 2005 - 05:44:23 EST

On Po 07-03-05 13:13:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 7 of March 2005 12:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, the Signed-off-by line was missing from the original patch. Andrew,
> > > should I resubmit it?
> > >
> >
> > I dropped lots of those swsusp patches due to various bit of breakage.
> > Pavel will be redoing all of them sometime, hopefully.
> These patches are a "redone version" of the patch that Pavel submitted
> before and Pavel has acked them already.
> I did my best not to break them, but if they are broken, could you please tell
> me what's wrong with them so that I can fix it?

Just bad timing, I guess. I sent wrong patches, and andrew reacted by
simply waiting for me to catch up with right tree (which is okay, it
was big and not critical).

Now, akpm sent all (?) swsusp updates to Linus, so it should appear in
bk tree later today. If you could regenerate the patches (1/3 will no
longer be needed) and send them to me & l-k. I'll then forward them to
akpm. [He seems to prefer patches to come from my email address :-)]

People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at