Re: Linux 22.214.171.124
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Mar 09 2005 - 06:18:31 EST
On St 09-03-05 09:52:46, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Greg KH wrote:
> >which is a patch against the 126.96.36.199 release. If consensus arrives
> >that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >way in the future.
> IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not 188.8.131.52, like -rc's that are'nt
> the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
You expect people to go through all 184.108.40.206, 220.127.116.11, ... . That
means .11.2 should be relative to .11.1, because otherwise people will
have to revert (ugly). And you want people to track -stable kernels as
fast as possible.
So Greg did it right.
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/