[patch 1/1] unified spinlock initialization arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c

[blaisorblade]

From: <domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <amitg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gud@xxxxxxx>

Unify the spinlock initialization as far as possible.

Signed-off-by: Amit Gud <gud@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx>
---

 linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff -puN arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~uml-switch-spinlock-init arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c
--- linux-2.6.11/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c~uml-switch-spinlock-init	2005-03-09 10:35:28.786848080 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-paolo/arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c	2005-03-09 10:35:28.789847624 +0100
@@ -185,11 +185,11 @@ void *port_data(int port_num)
 		  .has_connection 	= 0,
 		  .sem 			= __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER(port->sem, 
 								  0),
-		  .lock 		= SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED,
 		  .port 	 	= port_num,
 		  .fd  			= fd,
 		  .pending 		= LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->pending),
 		  .connections 		= LIST_HEAD_INIT(port->connections) });
+	spin_lock_init(&port->lock);
 	list_add(&port->list, &ports);
 
  found:
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/