Re: Linux 126.96.36.199
From: Marcelo Tosatti
Date: Wed Mar 09 2005 - 13:19:32 EST
The st/ide-tape/osst llseek changes havent been applied for what reason?
And what about the rest of fixups which Andrew sent you?
I suppose they didnt pass the -stable criteria. Can you share your thoughts
with the rest of us?
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:39:23AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> And to further test this whole -stable system, I've released 188.8.131.52.
> It contains one patch, which is already in the -bk tree, and came from
> the security team (hence the lack of the longer review cycle).
> It's available now in the normal kernel.org places:
> which is a patch against the 184.108.40.206 release. If consensus arrives
> that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> way in the future.
> A detailed changelog can be found at:
> A bitkeeper tree for the 2.6.11.y releases can be found at:
> The diffstat and short summary of the fixes are below.
> I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch itself,
> as it is small enough to do so.
> greg k-h
> Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/eventpoll.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> Summary of changes from v220.127.116.11 to v18.104.22.168
> Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> o Linux 22.214.171.124
> Linus Torvalds:
> o epoll: return proper error on overflow condition
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/