Re: [ patch 6/7] drivers/serial/jsm: new serial device driver
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Mar 09 2005 - 14:30:36 EST
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Kilau, Scott wrote:
> Hi Wendy, Greg, all,
> If IBM intends on our DPA management program to work for the JSM
> products, the ioctls are needed.
Wendy, what is IBM's stance on this?
> DPA support is a requirement for all Digi drivers, so it would
> not be possible for me to remove them from my "dgnc" version
> of the driver.
"requirement" from whom and to who? The Linux kernel community?
> For the JSM driver, its up to you whether you feel its needed or not.
> However, I would like to mention that the DIGI drivers that currently
> reside in the kernel sources *do* reserve that ioctl space,
> and is acknowledged by "Documentation/ioctl-number.txt":
> > d' F0-FF linux/digi1.h
> I understand that the list is not a reservation list,
> but a current list of potential ioctl conflicts...
It's not a reservation issue, it's the fact that we don't want to allow
new ioctls, and if we do, they had better work properly (your
implementation does not.)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/