Re: Linux

From: Wakko Warner
Date: Wed Mar 09 2005 - 17:02:02 EST

Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>which is a patch against the release. If consensus arrives
> >>>that this patch should be against the 2.6.11 tree, it will be done that
> >>>way in the future.
> >>
> >>IMHO it sould be against 2.6.11 and not, like -rc's that are'nt
> >>againt
> >>the last -rc but against 2.6.x.
> >
> >It's a stable release, not a pre/rc, so against sounds most
> >logical to
> >me.
> Well, yes, _if_ 2.6.12 patch is going to be to aply against 2.6.11.last
> instead
> of 2.6.11. And, well, either one will cause great panic for hose who aren't
> and
> the mailing lists and just visit to downoad the latest stuff.

IMHO, as long as 2.6.12 patches against 2.6.11, I'm cool with
patching against, but I think it should patch against 2.6.11

Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at