Re: Linux

From: Chris Wright
Date: Fri Mar 11 2005 - 15:35:30 EST

* Matt Mackall (mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Or do you want to do it the same way you do for every other branch? I
> don't want to special-case it in my code and I don't think users want
> to special-case it in their brains. Have separate interdiffs on the
> side, please, and then people can choose, but do it the standard way.
> Dear ${SUCKER}s, can we have a decision on this? My ketchup tool is
> broken for and I don't want to cut a new release until a firm
> decision is made. Obviously I have a strong preference for all 2.6.x.y
> diffs being against 2.6.x, it means that .y can be treated the same as
> -rc, -bk, -mm, ... (and I already coded it that way when came
> out).

I agree with having the patch be against .x, with x.y -> x.y+1 interdiffs
available on the side. Greg, any issue with that?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at