Re: [patch 01/14] char/snsc: reorder set_current_state() andadd_wait_queue()

[Greg Howard]

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Jesse Barnes wrote:

> On Sunday, March 6, 2005 2:36 pm, domen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Any comments would be, as always, appreciated.
>
> I don't have a problem with this change, but the maintainer probably should
> have been Cc'd.  Greg, does this change look ok to you?  Note that it's
> already been committed to the upstream tree, so if it's a bad change we'll
> need to have the cset excluded or something.

I think it's safe enough.  Since interrupts are off at this point,
I don't think the order of the two functions actually matters (i.e.
we couldn't have received a signal until the call to
spin_unlock_irqrestore() anyway).

Thanks - Greg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/