Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 12:33:01 EST
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:13:05AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Given the #ifdef mess, perhaps bridge should have the hooks available
> independent of the configuration.
The problem is the other way round:
The bridge code accesses hooks in the ATM code.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/