Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

[Adrian Bunk]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:11:29AM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> In message <20050315121930.GE3189@xxxxxxxxx>,Adrian Bunk writes:
> >This patch fixes the following compile error with CONFIG_BRIDGE=y and 
> >CONFIG_ATM_LANE=m:
> 
> isnt the problem more that CONFIG_ATM=m not CONFIG_ATM_LANE=m?
> perhaps CONFIG_BRIDGE should be dependent on CONFIG_ATM.  if
> atm is a module then bridge cannot be a module (unless the 
> hooks are moved from atm to bridge)?

The problem is currently CONFIG_ATM_LANE due to the #ifdef's in 
net/atm/common.c .

Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good 
idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM 
support.

Moving the hooks to the bridge code will give you exactly the same 
problems the other way round.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/