Re: BKCVS broken ?

[Hong Kong Phoey]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:21:25 +0100, Stelian Pop <stelian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:13:45AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:00:49AM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:38:53PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey, it's open source, I'm hoping that people will take that code and
> > > > evolve it do whatever they need.  We're willing to do what we can on
> > > > this end if people need protocol changes to support new features,
> > > > time permitting.  Think of that code as a prototype.  It's really
> > > > simple, you can hack it trivially.
> > >
> > >     ------------
> > >     if (strncmp("bk://", p, 5)) return (1);
> > >     ------------
> > >
> > > Any chance this could be made to work over http ?
> >
> > I don't see why not.  It will take some hacking though.  Can you live
> > without it for a bit or is it urgent?
> 
> It's not urgent at all...
> 

IMHO, BKCVS is just fine, what's broken is your head.

> Thanks.
> 
> Stelian.
> --
> Stelian Pop <stelian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/