Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA andDISCONTIG

[Dave Hansen]

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:08 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >  There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what
> >  is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA.  For instance, the NODE_DATA()
> >  macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM.
> > 
> >  This patch is required if the previous patch is applied.
> 
> This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64:
> 
> include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined
> include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> 
> I'll hack around it for now.

I'll make sure to have it fixed properly in my copy.

Could I have a copy of your .config?  I'm keeping a growing collection.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/