Re: [PATCH] alpha build fixes

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Mon Mar 21 2005 - 04:48:09 EST


On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:16:16 +0300, Ivan Kokshaysky
<ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:05:39AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:16:41 -0500, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 03:11:16PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:34:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > > +/* TODO: integrate with include/asm-generic/pci.h ? */
> > > > > +static inline int pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, int channel)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return channel ? 15 : 14;
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something, or is this *only* used by drivers/ide/pci/amd74xx.c?
> > > > Why in the world would we have this much infrastructure for one driver? And
> > > > why not just not compile that one for Alpha, since it'll never be used.
> > >
> > > My presumption is that it will be used in other IDE drivers in the
> > > future. Bart?
> >
> > This code is meant to be used by other IDE/libata drivers.
>
> Then isn't linux/ide.h the proper place for default pci_get_legacy_ide_irq()

ide.h is not shared between IDE and libata drivers (but ata.h is)

> implementation instead of asm-generic/pci.h? The latter is only used by
> 7 out of 23 architectures, so not only alpha gets broken.

I'm cc:ing Ben as it was his idea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/