Re: return value of ptep_get_and_clear

[Nick Piggin]

Kumar Gala wrote:
> ptep_get_and_clear has a signature that looks something like:
>
> static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned 
> long addr,
>                                        pte_t *ptep)
>
> It appears that its suppose to return the pte_t pointed to by ptep 
> before its modified.  Why do we bother doing this?  The caller seems 
> perfectly able to dereference ptep and hold on to it.  Am I missing 
> something here?

You need to be able to *atomically* clear the pte and retrieve the
old value.

Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/