Re: [rfc] git: combo-blobs

[Ingo Molnar]

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >	 Also, with a 'replicate the full object on every 8th commit' 
> > rule the risk would be somewhat mitigated as well.
> 
> ..but not the complexity.
> 
> The fact is, I want to trust this thing. Dammit, one reason I like GIT 
> is that I can mentally visualize the whole damn tree, and each step is 
> so _simple_. That's extra important when the object database itself is 
> so inscrutable - unlike CVS or SCCS or formats like that, it's damn 
> hard to visualize from looking at a directory listing.

ok. Meanwhile i found another counter-argument: the average committed 
file size is 36K, which with gzip -9 would compress down to roughly 8K, 
with the commit message being another block. That's 2+1 blocks used per 
commit, while with deltas one could at most cut this down to 1+1+1 
blocks - just as much space! So we would be almost even with the more 
complex delta approach, just by increasing the default compression ratio 
from 6 to 9. (but even with the default we are not that bad.)

case closed i guess. (The network bandwith issue can/could indeed be 
solved independently, without any impact to the fundamentals, as you 
suggested.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/