Re: [RFC PATCH] Dynamic sched domains (v0.5)

[Nick Piggin]

Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
> Ok, Here is the minimal patchset that I had promised after the
> last discussion.

The sched-domains part of it (kernel/sched.c) is looking much
better now. Haven't had a really good look, but it is definitely
on the right track now. Well done.

As I said before, I am not expert on the cpusets side of things,
but as far as sched-domains partitioning goes, we really just
want the absolute minimum support in kernel/sched.c which can be
managed by a higher layer.

I'll review it in detail when it gets into -mm, but I don't expect
to find any major problems.

Thanks,
Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/