Re: zImage on 2.6?

[Wakko Warner]

segin wrote:
> I'll be honest. zImage kernels are pointless, and are _BIGGER_ than a bzImage kernel.

Others have stated this.

> You should realize that use of zImage kernels detucts 100 points off your IQ.

I was trying to do comparisions between the 2.  I would not have cared
as long as 1) it was smaller and 2) it worked.

Maybe they should deduct 100 off whoever is keeping zImage target still in
the make files.

> Jeez... Is it just me or is it that most people today are too fucking retarded to use a computer?

Uh, excuse me?!  I ask a question and you have to do this?!  Really, you are
of no help to me.

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/