Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Wed, 2005-05-04 13:10:35 -0400, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/4/05, Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > I think the general opinion of posting patches as attachments
> > has changed over the last few years.  Mailers have been getting
> > a lot better at handling them, even quoting non-message-body
> > plain/text attachments in replies.
> 
> There is also the problem of things like gmail/yahoo where you can't
> control the word wrapping.  The only way to submit patches from those
> services is as an plain text attachment. If you try to submit then
> in-line and they wrap wrong you will collect a lot of hate mail from
> Andrew.

Well, why should someone use a broken mail service at all?

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier BÃrger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/