Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachmentpolicy

[Dave Hansen]

On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 10:55 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> I agree that things are better.  But, ironically, this patch is a case
> in point.  It's attached as text/x-patch and makes replying to and
> commenting on patch inline more laborious.

Well, crap.

I've sent an awful lot of patches that way, and never had a negative
reply from a maintainer or a patch commenter.

As an aside: is there a proper way to do patch text/plain attachments
from Evolution?  Maybe we need a quick tutorial on what the best way to
send patches is with several popular mailers.

-- Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/