Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] Uml: kludgy compilation fixes for x86-64 subarch modules support [for -mm]

[Blaisorblade]

On Tuesday 03 May 2005 01:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> blaisorblade@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > These are some trivial fixes for the x86-64 subarch module support. The
> > only potential problem is that I have to modify
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/module.c, to avoid copying the whole of it.
> >
> > I can't use it verbatim because it depends on a special vmalloc-like area
> > for modules, which for now (maybe that's to fix, I guess not) UML/x86-64
> > has not. I went the easy way and reused the i386 vmalloc()-based
> > allocator.
>
> Why is this "for -mm" and not for -linus?
That's a report on the current "review/testing" status, in this case because I 
wanted an ACK from Andi Kleen. Which acked it for himself but warned about 
the possible breakage for other archs.
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Skype user "PaoloGiarrusso"
Linux registered user n. 292729
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/