Re: [RFC][PATCH] update SubmittingPatches to clarify attachment policy

[Steven Cole]

Paulo Marques wrote:
> Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>
> > Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >
> > > The problem is replying to an attachment.  The reason why having
> > > the patch in the main mail body is good is that it gets quoted
> > > by the email software and you can easily reply to individual
> > > parts of the patch.
> >
> >
> >
> > If the attachment is "disposition=inline", does the problem still exist?
>
>
> I've just checked this with Thunderbird (which is the mail client I use).
>
> It not only sets the disposition=inline by default when attaching 
> patches, it also places the patch inline when replying to it, allowing 
> the user to write between the text of the patch as if it were part of 
> the email text.
>
> However if we Copy+Paste the patch into the mail it gets line wrapped / 
> white space mangled.

That depends on where you are Copy+Pasting from.  Granted, Copy+Paste from
a variety of sources is a nightmare.  But, Copy+Paste from Tbird to Tbird
seems to actually work.

> So at least for Thunderbird users it would be better to use attached 
> patches with "Content-Disposition: inline".

Here is a trick you can play with Thunderbird to get inlined patches:

1) Mail the patch to yourself as an attachment.
2) Read the mail you just got, copy and paste the patch to your new message.

This method preserves the tabs/whitespace. Of course, you have to set the
wordwrap settings appropriately. It works for me.

Steven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/