RE: [PATCH 2/4] rt_mutex: add new plist implementation

[Daniel Walker]

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:39, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote:

> 
> I guess I am still very biased by my implementation, where returning
> that was almost free because of how the functions where implemented
> (which steamed from the fact that they had to always compute the
> new priority to store it in the head).
> 
> So as you say, the best way is wrapping your primitives around. I'd
> suggest a shorter postfix, something like _prio() or _chkprio().

I still say re-implementation of plist is a waste .. Why re-make the
wheel when you have a perfectly good starting point .

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/