Re: [patch 1/1] Proposed: Let's not waste precious IRQs...

[Ashok Raj]

Hi Natalie,

have you taken a look a the Vector Sharing Patch posted by Kaneshige for IA64?

Cheers,
ashok


On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:06:13AM -0700, Natalie.Protasevich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>    I  suggest  to  change  the  way  IRQs  are handed out to PCI devices.
>    Currently, each I/O APIC pin gets associated with an IRQ, no matter if
>    the  pin  is used or not. It is expected that each pin can potentually
>    be  engaged  by  a  device  inserted  into the corresponding PCI slot.
>    However,  this  imposes severe limitation on systems that have designs
>    that employ many  I/O APICs, only utilizing couple lines of each, such
>    as P64H2 chipset. It is used in ES7000, and currently, there is no way
>    to boot the system with more that 9 I/O APICs. The simple change below
>    allows  to  boot  a  system  with  say  64  (or  more) I/O APICs, each
>    providing  1  slot, which otherwise impossible because of the IRQ gaps
>    created  for  unused  lines  on each I/O APIC. It does not resolve the
>    problem  with  number of devices that exceeds number of possible IRQs,
>    but  eases  up a tension for IRQs on any large system with potentually
>    large  number  of  devices. I only implemented this for the ACPI boot,
>    since if the system is this big and
>.. deleted... 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/