Re: [PATCH] SATA NCQ support

[Jeff Garzik]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>
> > > suck and should not be cared about, and if I were to go into SATA, I
> > > should just get a new controller and forget about my onboard VIA crap.
> > > (I read newer VIA are supposed to support AHCI which is good.)
> >
> > SATA is still pretty fast without NCQ, it just makes some operations a
>
>
> Do I take this as SATA is faster than legacy ATA? In what respect?
> UDMA/33 and SATA I shouldn't be much different if I use the same drive,
> or is there something?

It is "likely" to be faster.  Faster bus, newer technology.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/