Re: [PATCH] ppc64: actually call prom_send_capabilities

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Tue May 31 2005 - 18:43:35 EST



>
> Index: arch/ppc64/kernel/prom_init.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 3ac19ebb77c3cd8a1df31b7170c6eaf9e1afb1a4/arch/ppc64/kernel/prom_init.c (mode:100644 sha1:6f79b7b9b445e8669411e34b48c1ea8ce5135965)
> +++ 11f504429d5e6708259f376b76e96cafd3bf9215/arch/ppc64/kernel/prom_init.c (mode:100644 sha1:bc53967a86436d6b3f4a4f324273e01fdab934b3)
> @@ -1881,6 +1881,12 @@ unsigned long __init prom_init(unsigned
> &getprop_rval, sizeof(getprop_rval));
>
> /*
> + * On pSeries, inform the firmware about our capabilities
> + */
> + if (RELOC(of_platform) & PLATFORM_PSERIES)
> + prom_send_capabilities();
> +
> + /*
> * On pSeries, copy the CPU hold code
> */
> if (RELOC(of_platform) & PLATFORM_PSERIES)
> -

/* Platforms supported by PPC64 */
#define PLATFORM_PSERIES 0x0100
#define PLATFORM_PSERIES_LPAR 0x0101
#define PLATFORM_ISERIES_LPAR 0x0201
#define PLATFORM_LPAR 0x0001
#define PLATFORM_POWERMAC 0x0400
#define PLATFORM_MAPLE 0x0500

Hrm... this will trigger on Maple too... Should I change Maple
definition ? That would break kexec of maple from existing to newer
kernels though.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/