Re: Avoiding external fragmentation with a placement policy Version12

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Fri Jun 03 2005 - 21:16:56 EST


Herbert Xu wrote:
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

network code. If the latter, that would suggest at least in theory
it could use noncongiguous physical pages.


With Dave's latest super-TSO patch, TCP over loopback will only be
doing order-0 allocations in the common case. UDP and others may
still do large allocations but that logic is all localised in
ip_append_data.

So if we wanted we could easily remove most large allocations over
the loopback device.

I would be very interested to look into that. I would be
willing to do benchmarks on a range of machines too if
that would be of any use to you.

Thanks,
Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/