Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 	For me it's strictly a speed question. I was reviewing 
> V0.7.40-04 and it looks like apples and oranges to me. It's more a 
> question of where do you perfer the latency , in up() or in down() .. 
> plist is slower for non-RT tasks, but non-RT tasks also get the 
> benefit of priority ordering.

what benefit do non-RT tasks get from plists, compared to the ordered 
list? Non-RT tasks are not PI handled in any way.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/