Re: [RFC] Patch series to remove devfs [00/22]

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Yes, there are many places where 2.4 and 2.6 are not source compatible 
> for good reasons. But if the effort for maintaining compatibility 
> between 2.4 and 2.6 in one area is as easy as keeping a header file with 
> some dummy funtions it's worth considering.

The devfs calls for 2.4 and 2.6 are totally incompatible.  And there's
a trivial way to support both 2.4 and 2.6 in this area:  don't support
devfs at all, it always was marked either experimental or deprecated
anyway.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/