Re: [PATCH 2.4.31 6/9] gcc4: fix x86_64 sys_iopl() bug

[Mikael Pettersson]

Andi wrote:
> > @@ -113,9 +113,18 @@ quiet_ni_syscall:
> >  	PTREGSCALL stub32_fork, sys32_fork
> >  	PTREGSCALL stub32_clone, sys32_clone
> >  	PTREGSCALL stub32_vfork, sys32_vfork
> > -	PTREGSCALL stub32_iopl, sys_iopl
> >  	PTREGSCALL stub32_rt_sigsuspend, sys_rt_sigsuspend
> >  
> > +	.macro PTREGSCALL3 label, func, arg
> 
> PTREGSCALL3? I'm sure that is not in 2.6. How about just changing
> PTREGSCALL globally? 

Well I renamed it so that I could use it _only_ for the required
syscalls, i.e. sys_iopl(). I can change all of them if you feel
that's more appropriate.

/Mikael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/