Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc6-V0.7.48-00

From: Gene Heskett
Date: Sun Jun 12 2005 - 09:25:26 EST


On Sunday 12 June 2005 09:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think I see. Do you have a swag as to how much runtime overhead
>> using softirq's only might cause? [...]
>
>should be barely measurable for desktop workloads. For servers it
> might be significant, depending on the amount of IRQ traffic. For
> any box doing less than 2000-3000 irqs/sec it should be very small.
>
> Ingo

Chuckle, for me that would be a 'mox nix' using the english
spelling. :-) And seti made a liar out of me, it did do 7 units
yesterday.

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/