Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls.

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:31 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I don't see the need for higher precision in this API and a change is
> confusing.  There is nanosleep() for people who only want a delay and
> that can be done with high precision.

If that's the case, might one enquire as to why pselect() has a struct
timespec instead of a struct timeval?

Or would the answer just depress me?
> 
-- 
dwmw2


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/