Re: [PATCH] modules, small codingstyle cleanup, one statement/expressionpr line

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Sun Jun 19 2005 - 15:48:21 EST


On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> Small patch to make kernel/module.c a little more readable and a little
> more CodingStyle conforming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> kernel/module.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.12-orig/kernel/module.c 2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.12/kernel/module.c 2005-06-19 21:24:26.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1731,8 +1731,10 @@ static struct module *load_module(void _
> kfree(args);
> free_hdr:
> vfree(hdr);
> - if (err < 0) return ERR_PTR(err);
> - else return ptr;
> + if (err < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + else
> + return ptr;
>
> truncated:
> printk(KERN_ERR "Module len %lu truncated\n", len);
>
>
Joe Perches suggested we use

if (err < 0)
return ERR_PTR(err);
return ptr;

instead. The behaviour of the code is the same, but it is of course a bit
shorter, so here's an alternative patch - pick the one you prefer.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>
---

--- linux-2.6.12-orig/kernel/module.c 2005-06-17 21:48:29.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.12/kernel/module.c 2005-06-19 22:48:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -1731,9 +1731,9 @@ static struct module *load_module(void _
kfree(args);
free_hdr:
vfree(hdr);
- if (err < 0) return ERR_PTR(err);
- else return ptr;
-
+ if (err < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+ return ptr;
truncated:
printk(KERN_ERR "Module len %lu truncated\n", len);
err = -ENOEXEC;



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/