Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (fuse)

[Theodore Ts'o]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:48:50PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On the other hand, sometimes a root process, or some other user's
> > process, might _want_ to give permission to allow a trusted FUSE
> > filesystem the potential to monkey with it (return potentially
> > untrusted information, or stop it entirely), in exchange for access to
> > the filesystem.  So it would be nice if there was some way that a
> > process could tell the kernel that it is willing to give permission to
> > allow certain FUSE filesystems to potentially affect it.  Say, via a
> > fnctl() call, perhaps.
> 
> Hmm.  'su' works for root.  

??  Not sure what you're saying.

> How do you think fcntl() could be used?  I think a task flag settable
> via prctl() would be more appropriate.

The problem with a task flag is that a root process might not want to
give permission for _all_ user-mountable filesystem, but only certain
ones.  So the idea is that the process should be able to specify
specific mountpoints as being "ok" for the process to access.

					- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/