Re: reiser4 plugins

[Bernd Eckenfels]

In article <42BBB47C.9010002@xxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
> How about a poor-man's isolation -- any process other than that
> responsible for the transaction sees a consistent state, never a
> transaction-in-progress.  I'm sure there's a name for that.

It is Isolation Level Serializeable. It is the less performant isolation
level and still can generate deadlocks if you have two process doing
transactions.

A more simpler solution would be that process without transactions never see
infligt tx and a second process simple returnes a retry error if touching a
locked ressource.

Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/