Re: Novell Linux Kernel Debugger (NLKD)

[jmerkey]

Chris Mason wrote:

> On Friday 24 June 2005 00:59, jmerkey wrote:
>  
>
> > Jan Beulich wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > > It's a GBD replacement and is not fully open source.
> > > >        
> > > What is not open source in it ()?
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > KDB is at present more capable. It has a lot of promise, but it does not
> > > > have the all the architectural
> > > > features necessary to replace either KDB or GDB at present.
> > > >        
> > > While I never used or saw kdb, I'd be curious about what you immediately
> > > saw missing...
> > >      
> > 1. No back trace
> > 2. Doesn't run standalone fully embeded in the kernel
> > 3. Not fully open source (since it's not embeded in the kernel)
> > 4. IA64 doesn't really matter, since IA64 is basically dead anyway
> > 5. No advanced recursive descent parser for conditional breakpoints
> >    
>
> This is more or less completely inaccurate.
>
>  

Which one -- more ?  or less ? 

Jeff

> -chris
>
>
>
>  

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/