Re: Promise ATA/133 Errors With 2.6.10+

[Erik Slagter]

On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 18:59 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sad, 2005-06-25 at 09:35, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > > BTW2 could it be that somewhere a timeout has been lowered in recent
> > > kernels? That must have been pre-2.6.11 then.
> 
> Timeouts have not changed or have increased in fact.

Never mind, the offending harddisk has ceased to be yesterday, it is no
more.

What really bothers me, though, is that until the very last moment it
was alive, it didn't report any smart error, nor did any self test fail.
I guess IBM is to blame here :-(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/