Re: Problems with Firewire and -mm kernels (was: Re: 2.6.12-mm2)

[Andrew Morton]

Rogério Brito <rbrito@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jun 27 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  > Could you please generate the dmesg output from 2.6.12 and 2.6.12-mm2 and,
>  > if there are any relevant-looking differences, send them?
> 
>  Ok, I put them both on <http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/bug/>.

Great, here we are:

-ieee1394: Node added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[0050c501e00010e8]
+ieee1394: Node added: ID:BUS[0-01:1023]  GUID[0050c501e00010e8]
+ieee1394: The root node is not cycle master capable; selecting a new root node and resetting...
+ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023
 ieee1394: Node changed: 0-00:1023 -> 0-01:1023
 SCSI subsystem initialized
 sbp2: $Rev: 1219 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx>
@@ -300,14 +308,6 @@
 ieee1394: sbp2: Logged into SBP-2 device
 ieee1394: Node 0-00:1023: Max speed [S400] - Max payload [2048]
   Vendor: ST316002  Model: 1A                Rev: 3.06
-  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 06
-SCSI device sda: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB)
-sda: asking for cache data failed
-sda: assuming drive cache: write through
-SCSI device sda: 312581808 512-byte hdwr sectors (160042 MB)
-sda: asking for cache data failed
-sda: assuming drive cache: write through
- sda: [mac] sda1 sda2 sda3 sda4
-Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
+  Type:   Unknown                            ANSI SCSI revision: 04
 ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023
 ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023]  GUID[0050c501e00010e8]

Could the 1394 guys please suggest what might have caused this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/