Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:

> But nit picking aside, is it true that we need a load barrier before
> unlock? (store barrier I agree with) The ppc64 changeset in question
> indicates yes, but I can't quite work out why. There are noises in the
> archives about this, but I didn't pinpoint a conclusion...

A spinlock may be used to read a consistent set of variables. If load
operations would be moved below the spin_unlock then one may get values
that have been updated after another process acquired the spinlock.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/