Re: Linux 2.6.13-rc1

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Wed Jun 29 2005 - 10:08:31 EST


On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:23:11PM +0200, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
> >
> > On x86_64 with reiserfs and ext3 on dm (using cfq scheduler) the log
> > is full of this:
> >
> > Badness in blk_remove_plug at drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c:1424
>
> Also on x86, Reiserfs on LVM2, cfq, on sata_sil; Preemption set to
> Voluntary.

You should find the patch I posted just a little earlier fixes all that...

get_request is now expected to be holding on to queue_lock, with interrupts
disabled, when it returns NULL; but one path forgot that, causing all kinds
of nastiness under swap load - badness backtraces, strange failures, BUGs.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>

--- 2.6.13-rc1/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2005-06-29 11:54:08.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c 2005-06-29 14:41:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -1917,10 +1917,9 @@ get_rq:
* limit of requests, otherwise we could have thousands of requests
* allocated with any setting of ->nr_requests
*/
- if (rl->count[rw] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2)) {
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+ if (rl->count[rw] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
goto out;
- }
+
rl->count[rw]++;
rl->starved[rw] = 0;
if (rl->count[rw] >= queue_congestion_on_threshold(q))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/