Re: PREEMPT_RT and I-PIPE: the numbers, take 3

From: Bill Davidsen
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 10:02:33 EST


Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:54:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

If you were suggesting this to be run on an SMP system, I would agree
with you. I, too, would very much like to see these results run on a
2-CPU or 4-CPU system, although I am most certainly -not- asking Kristian
and Karim to do this work -- it is very much someone else's turn in the
barrel, I would say!


No, I'm suggesting that you and other folks understand the basic ideas
behind this patch and stop asking unbelievably stupid questions. This has
been covered over and over again, and I shouldn't have to repeat these
positions constantly because folks have both a language comprehension
problem and inability to bug off appropriately.

The reasons you have to repeat yourself are (a) you lack communications skills and expect people to read past your insults, (b) you're just technically wrong in some cases, such as saying that the results would be different if the kernel were compiled in an unrealistic way.


However, on a UP system, I have to agree with Kristian's choice of
configuration. An embedded system developer running on a UP system would
naturally use a UP Linux kernel build, so it makes sense to benchmark
a UP kernel on a UP system.


Dual cores are going to be standard in the next few years so RTOSs should
anticipate these things coming down the pipeline.

s/standard/common/

I doubt that single core CPUs are going to vanish, there are too many power critical (heat critical) embedded applications. In many the response time is important but the total CPU capability isn't an issue while battery life or fanless operation is.

Your point that SMP operation is important is true, but I see no reason to think Ingo has missed that.

--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/