PCI Power management (was: Re: [PATCH 4/13]: PCI Err: e100 ethernet driver recovery

From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Thu Jun 30 2005 - 16:06:19 EST


On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:58:29PM +0200, Andi Kleen was heard to remark:
> > Yep, OK. Pushig the timer would in fact break if the device was marked
> > perm disabled.
>
> I think for network drivers you should just write a generic error handler
> (perhaps in net/core/dev.c) that calls the watchdog handler.
> Then all drivers could be easily converted without much code duplication.

Well, there's no watchdog per-se in "struct net_device" -- are you
suggesting I add one?

It looks like I can almost create generic handlers for net devices;
looks like calling netdev->stop() is enough to handle the error
detection.

However, a generic bringup would need to call pci_enable_device(),
and net/core/dev.c does not include pci.h so I can't really do it
there. Other than that, a generic recovry routine looks like it might
be possible; I'll have to experiment; its hard to tell by reading code.

This might be the wrong paradigm, though. The pci error recovery
routines are *almost identical* to the power-management suspend/resume
routines. From what I can tell, the only real difference is that
I want to not actually turn off/on the power.

Thus, the right thing to do might be to split up the
struct pci_dev->suspend() and pci_dev->resume() calls into

suspend()
poweroff()
poweron()
resume()

and then have the generic pci error recovery routines call
suspend/resume only, skipping the poweroff-on calls. Does that
sound good?

I'm not sure I can pull this off without having someone from
the power-management world throw a brick at me.

--linas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/