Re: function ordering (was: Re: [RFC] exit_thread() speedups in x86process.c)

From: Hugh Dickins
Date: Mon Jul 04 2005 - 05:31:43 EST


On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > this way we don't need to put a lot of __slow's in the code *and* it's
> > > based on measurements not assumptions, and can be tuned for a specific
> > > situation in addition.
> >
> > This is reminiscent of "fur", whose source Old SCO opened.
> > Google for SCO fur: amidst all the hits about "fur flying"
> > you might find something useful!
>
> Was it? I was at Scaldera back in the days when it was supposed to get
> opensourced, but AFAIK it never actually happened, everyone just talked
> about it.

Look like you're right. Google shows me an announcement of intent,
and a man page, and an interesting gcc discussion; but no fur source.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/