Re: share/private/slave a subtree - define vs enum

[Mike Waychison]

Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Mike Waychison wrote:
>
> > enums in C are (de?)promoted to integral types under most conditions, so 
> > the type-checking is useless.
>
>
> It's a warning in gcc afaik and spare should complain as well.

Check again.

You must be thinking of another language.

Show me how you can get warnings out of this:

enum foo { FOO, };


static enum foo doit(enum foo bar) {
        int i = bar;
        return i;
}


int main(void)
{
        int i;
        i = doit(0);
        return 0;
}

Mike Waychison
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/