Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modified firmware_class.c to add a new function request_firmware_nowait_nohotplug

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:54:07PM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Also, why not just add the hotplug flag to the firmware structure?
> That
> request_firmware kmalloc's the firmware structure and frees it when
> returned. The only way to indicate request_firmware to skip hotplug was
> by passing a hotplug flag on the stack. 

Ok, how about changing the function to pass in a flag saying what it
wants (wait/nowait, hotplug/nohotplug) and fix up all callers of it?

> > way you don't have to add another function just to add another flag.
> > And you could probably get rid of the nowait version in the same way.
> Also thought of leaving request_firmware_nowait intact didn't want to
> break others using this function.

Did you find any other in-kernel use of request_firmware_nowait?  I
don't see any :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/