Re: Patch for slab leak debugging

[Manfred Spraul]

Alexander Nyberg wrote:

> Yeah I knew there was one, but I thought that was a standalone patch
> (the one turning all bufctl to unsigned long, turning off irqs and
> printing all slabs_full to console), my intention with this was a
> proper /proc entry, something that could be a simple config option.
>
>  
No, I never wrote a proper /proc interface. But I think the bufctl 
approach is the better solution than storing the first 5 entries in the 
slab structure:
What if there is a leak on a cache with more than 5 entries per slab?

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/