Re: [RFC][PATCH] i386: Per node IDT

[Zwane Mwaikambo]

Hello Oleg,

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S	3 Jul 2005 13:20:43 -0000	1.1.1.1
> > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/entry.S	10 Jul 2005 22:33:37 -0000
> > -
> > +/* Build the IRQ entry stubs */
> >  vector=0
> > -ENTRY(irq_entries_start)
> > +	.align IRQ_STUB_SIZE,0x90
> > +ENTRY(interrupt)
> >  .rept NR_IRQS
> >  	ALIGN
> > -1:	pushl $vector-256
> > +	pushl $vector
> >  	jmp common_interrupt
> >
> >  [...snip...]
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c	3 Jul 2005 13:20:43 -0000	1.1.1.1
> > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc1-mm1/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c	4 Jul 2005 21:39:56 -0000
> > @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ static union irq_ctx *softirq_ctx[NR_CPU
> >   */
> >  fastcall unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {	
> > -	/* high bits used in ret_from_ code */
> > -	int irq = regs->orig_eax & 0xff;
> > +	int irq = regs->orig_eax;
> 
> Could you explain this change? I think it breaks do_signal/handle_signal,
> they check orig_eax >= 0 to handle -ERESTARTSYS:
> 
> 	/* Are we from a system call? */
> 	if (regs->orig_eax >= 0) {
> 		/* If so, check system call restarting.. */
> 		switch (regs->eax) {
> 		        case -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK:
> 			case -ERESTARTNOHAND:

The change is so that we can send IRQs higher than 256 to do_IRQ. That 
looks like it tries to check if we came in via system_call since we'd save 
the system call number as orig_eax. Now that i think about it, doesn't 
that path always get taken when we interrupt userspace and have pending 
signals on return from interrupt?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/