Re: [ANNOUNCE] Interbench v0.20 - Interactivity benchmark

[Con Kolivas]

On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:55, Al Boldi wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > It runs a real time high priority timing thread that wakes up the thread
>
> Nice, but why is it threaded?

Because I'm an amateur, and I had to start somewhere.

> Forking would be more realistic!

Something for the future would be to fork the background workload separately 
from the benchmarked workload. Having them all in the same mm does appear to 
cause other interactions which pollute the real time data as Ingo has pointed 
out to me privately.

I'm a little burnt out from the effort so far so it can wait.

Thanks for feedback.

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature