Re: 2.6.13-rc3-mm1 (ckrm)

[Paul Jackson]

Shailabh wrote:
> So if the current CPU controller 
>   implementation is considered too intrusive/unacceptable, it can be 
> reworked or (and we certainly hope not) even rejected in perpetuity. 

It is certainly reasonable that you would hope such.

But this hypothetical possibility concerns me a little.  Where would
that leave CKRM, if it was in the mainline kernel, but there was no CPU
controller in the mainline kernel?  Wouldn't that be a rather serious
problem for many users of CKRM if they wanted to work on mainline
kernels?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/